Moving Traffic Enforcement Consultation Results Summary
A total of 704 location-specific responses were recorded across the five locations. Results are reported separately because a respondent could support enforcement at one location while opposing it at another.
|
Location |
Total |
In favour |
Against |
Neutral |
No rating |
|
London Road / New England Road |
129 |
61 (47.3%) |
56 (43.4%) |
8 (6.2%) |
4 (3.1%) |
|
Francis Street / Ditchling Road |
133 |
70 (52.6%) |
52 (39.1%) |
4 (3.0%) |
7 (5.3%) |
|
Carden Crescent / Carden Avenue |
124 |
68 (54.8%) |
49 (39.5%) |
4 (3.2%) |
3 (2.4%) |
|
Ditchling Road / Baker Street |
112 |
56 (50.0%) |
47 (42.0%) |
4 (3.6%) |
5 (4.5%) |
|
Rottingdean High Street / West Street |
206 |
148 (71.8%) |
49 (23.8%) |
4 (1.9%) |
5 (2.4%) |
Overall, responses showed support for introducing camera enforcement at the proposed locations. Respondents highlighted benefits relating to road safety, pedestrian safety and compliance with existing restrictions.
Respondents generally supported the introduction of camera enforcement and highlighted the benefits of:
· Improving road safety.
· Protecting pedestrians and other vulnerable road users.
· Encouraging compliance with existing traffic restrictions.
· Reducing congestion and improving traffic flow.
Respondents also raised questions and suggestions relating to:
· Signage and road markings.
· Access arrangements for residents, businesses and other permitted users.
· Privacy and the use of camera technology.